Discrete vs Continuous Distributions
A practical guide to choosing between discrete and continuous probability models based on your variable type and analysis goals.
Jump directly into the interval probability workflow and apply this guide on a live distribution chart.
Open Interactive Interval ProbabilityThe Fundamental Difference
Discrete distributions assign probabilities to individual values (P(X = k) > 0), while continuous distributions assign probabilities only to intervals. For continuous variables, P(X = exact value) is always 0.
This distinction determines which function describes the distribution: a probability mass function (PMF) for discrete, or a probability density function (PDF) for continuous.
Common Discrete Distributions
The binomial counts successes in a fixed number of trials. The Poisson counts events in an interval. The geometric counts trials until the first success. The negative binomial counts trials until a target number of successes.
Choose discrete models when your outcome is a count or takes values from a finite or countable set.
Common Continuous Distributions
The normal models symmetric measurement data. The exponential models waiting times with constant rate. The beta models proportions on [0, 1]. The gamma and Weibull cover right-skewed positive quantities like lifetimes and claim sizes.
Choose continuous models when your outcome can take any value in an interval, even if you observe rounded or binned data.
Approximations Between Discrete and Continuous
The normal approximation to the binomial works well when np and n(1−p) are both at least 10. The Poisson approximation to the binomial applies when n is large and p is small.
These approximations simplify computation and are useful when exact discrete calculations are expensive, but always check the conditions before relying on them.
Choosing the Right Type for Your Data
Start by asking whether your variable can take non-integer values. If yes, use a continuous model. If your variable is a count with a clear upper bound, binomial is natural. If counts have no practical upper bound, consider Poisson or negative binomial.
When in doubt, plot your data and compare it to candidate PMFs or PDFs. The visual check often resolves ambiguity faster than formal tests.